There's a lot of stuff on this car that's on my '17 Civic Si :/

It's classic racism, just because it's Japanese people hate it

The problem with it is that it doesnt look like a supercar, it looks like a high end civic.


The OG NSX looked like a fucking modern f40.

Lmao here in Italy some crazy ass is selling his black NSX for 50 grand. 50!!! You can buy this car at the price of a Civic!

Say what you will, I love this car

They got to change the god damn logo (A) to something else special more aggressive!!!!and really drop the price on that 💩 to 100 that's all it needs... and no it doesn't or is what the old nsx was ... please !!!!!

156k give me a brake the new C8 Corvette has the same stats and does it for less than half the price.

For 200k I rather buy a ferrari. Doug, is Acura paying you a nice check to shoot this video hahaha. Lol

Even if the upcoming C8 Corvette costs less, the NSX is still a really good buy for a supercar. Plus the NSX gets better mileage.

It's cool but to expensive I rather buy a Subaru brz and modify it for cheaper price

I could get a used huracan for that much

No score?

What this car needed was 30-50k discount remove the front electric motors or ditch the whole hybrid system and offered a manual, enthusiasts then would had hyped it up after release and snobs would have flocked to the automatics .

This car is sweet

This car is amazing but shouldn’t b priced a hair over 60k w depreciation 45k-50k , these wouldn’t even stay on the lot if they were priced like that, but Acura had to u know. Acura things up

Doug is the type of guy to make "drake is the type of guy" jokes

I would not mind that the NSX shares interior switches and parts from an ILX, because in this case, the NSX is a Honda, which means reliability and quality. Maserati, Dodge, and FCA in general have been notorious for quality and reliability issues, that's why it was worth pointing out that interior switches and parts from the now discontinued Dodge Dart with dodgy quality and reliability is on the $85k Ghibli. It's like Maserati doesn't care about their customers.

250000euro in Europe

The reason why it isn't selling is a cheap interior. Cheap screens. No sound, high mileage is cool but here in America people love their pops and crackers, or atleast some cool acceleration sound. The design is considered bad by some. And yes it's an Acura so that doesn't help

Honda fanboys crying. Suddenly realizing that the NSX will never be as sought after or thought of as highly and furthermore so rare as the LFA in 50 years.

Wow. It took 15 minutes to get to the point. 99% of this video contains Doug getting wood over his obvious bias towards this car. Watch the last minute. Real world it's a car no one needs now or wants. The world laughed collectively when they went to buy one and saw Honda Accord design cues and parts all over the interior. No thanks.

Dam Doug took a few too many bumps before shooting this video lmao🤪

For the money, it needs 100 more horsepower and 100 more pound feet of torque.

9:44 STOP DRIVING OVER THE MANHOLE COVERS!

Back when Doug used to speak fast enough. Now, he's like "Thisssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss".

Nice coupe

Really....... WORST color ever...... I would never buy a red car....... NEVER NEVER EVER.......... sorry just me ...... I WANT BLACK ON BLACK....... with black trim

As a former owner of the original NSX (back in 2003) I love this thing... *But* ... the reality is the only people that are willing to pony up near $200k for Hondas, Nissans or Toyotas by and large can't actually afford them. So they amount to populist fantasy, with anti-Ferrari comments racking up thousands of "thumbs up", while they sit rotting on lots. This was the same problem in 2003 when I bought my NSX (MSRP $89k, got it for *$75k brand new* ) and again in 2014 when I bought a GTR BE (MSRP $109k, got it for *$89k brand new* ) And those were *cheap* compared to these current prices; Acura claims the NSX is $156k, but *none* ship below $200k. Time has moved on since 1991. The R8 exists (cheaper), the Corvette is a world beater and somehow has barely gone up in price. Porsche has *lower cost* options (Boxster, Cayman) that are in many ways *superior* to the 911. Honda waited forever and while waiting allowed the Acura brand to become total crap, before launching a *$200k* car. "It's like a 911 Turbo". Except.. It's *the same price as a 911 Turbo* and it's *an Acura.* When the original NSX launched it was $60k (people forget that), and there was *nothing* else like it. The Corvette was a complete piece of crap (the C4). Porsche was *far* more expensive and the Boxster and Cayman didn't exist. The only thing even close to the NSX was the Supra, but as great as the MKIV Supra was, it didnt have near the exotic appeal. 2019 has *no* similarity. There are a *ton* of options even at $80k, much less $200k. And the "alternative to a Ferrari" excuse simply *can't* work for Acura. The $200k alternative to a Ferrari is an R8 or 911 Turbo, *not* an Acura. Toyota would have had a far better shot at doing something like this with the Supra under the Lexus brand, but they *wisely* chose to go the smart route and make that car affordable for the *actual target audience.*

I miss the Acura Integra Type R. Acura needs to make something more affordable.

"Giant spoiler" 1.5 inch lip