Anthony Badaloo held hostage. Unidentified man demand money with menaces. Claim to be in possession of a Sealed Court Order and / or Warrant, which they cannot produce, and neither can anyone else.
Taking Cash under Duress, processed by Santander bank complicitly.
The County Court Act 1984 s.135 protects men and women from fraudulent extortion by claims on Authentic Court Documents, and Instruments which have not been ISSUED BY THE COURT. (Forgeries). Carries up to seven years, that.

Illegal Bailiffs Trapped
1) Failed to identify themselves (Cowboys)
2) Says its for Council Tax
3) Says it’s Parking Tickets
4) Says they don’t have to give warrant until AFTER they steal money
5) Failed to supply warrant AT ANY TIME
6) Says County Court Warrants does not have to be sealed
7) Says only High Court Warrants have to be sealed
8) This is a repeat Crime of 15 counts – No Court Proceedings ISSUED BY THE COURT
9) Purported warrant not on any official court record
10) Theft of DATA (Contrary to Data Protection Act 1998)
11) Have support of police who say to theft “It’s a civil matter” as per video below
12) Making false claims to “Court Orders/Warrants” is profitable crime for the operators, and is an epidemic on the British Public, which must be stopped. Contact your MP.
www.change.org/p/theresa-may-terrorism-of-the-public-and-fraud-upon-the-court-must-end-now/u/14062142

Comments

    • philip ahern
      philip ahern

      I can't wait to see you costa. Really looking forward to meeting you.

      about 1 day ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      David De Surrey is with Oz-a Oz-a and Matthew John.
      3 hrs ·

      "LEGAL" SYSTEM, is NOT actually LAWFUL.

      The LEGAL SYSTEM is a copyrighted Vatican/City-of-London invention.
      The LEGAL SYSTEM is a heartless and IMMORAL method of controlling & harvesting LEGALLY entrapped, "under-educate" people.
      The LEGAL SYSTEM was ominously designed, to poison EVERYTHING that' LAWFUL. This system was required by the Vatican in order to create a change of power-structure for the Vatican, and it's Vatican copyright owned, worldwide "Royal" sub-corporations.

      OUR TICKET
      TO FREEDOM.
      The LEGAL VERSION of "your name" is their lynch-pin/control button.. that THEY are able to use LEGALLY, to create a situation whereby they can insert THEIR CLAIM of, A CODE BREAK..
      THEY THEN "oblige" THEIR AUTHORITY OVER YOU, and thus "charge you" a FEE
      (..a fine, as they call it).

      This compulsory FINE comes with a threat of imprisonment if you further-argue THEIR verdict, or you default on THEIR stipulated punishment/payment timeline.

      no hate here just T R U T H.!

      HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM GOT STARTED..
      In 1214 the Vatican made a claim of being the "Vicar of Christ"
      (Meaning, they've claimed to be the steward of everything on Earth, 'till Christ returns).
      Yup, it's mad talk!

      So LEGALLY, today, WE ALL SERVE ROME. (Actually, the BANK Of Rome - a.k.a. the Vatican)
      "We serve" VIA the LEGAL Birth Certificate, AND THEN, the LEGAL "version" of our names this is the TITLED, ALL CAPS version of our names we use to conduct commerce of any kind).
      We are also "harvested" by THEIR LEGAL REGISTRATION construct, that we are obliged to go along with, under the Vatican's assortment of LEGAL SOCIETY Statutes, around the world.

      HOW THEIR CRUEL GAME WORKS..
      Under the Vatican's WORLDWIDE LEGAL SYSTEM, you'll never OWN anything, in ANY PUBLIC arena. You have been conscripted to act as a member of the PUBLIC, instead of claiming your natural born RIGHTS as one of the PEOPLE. They claim.. you prefer to be treated as a OWNED corporate fiction, and NOT act, and be treated as a LIVING BEING.

      This is all very clever, but immoral!

      Through "State hospital LEGAL-patient admission" trickery, and word-concept "magic", we-the-people are born into a debt-servitude slavery-system called PRESUMED & assumed, citizenship.

      So, the house, condo, car, dog, gun, business, even your invention etc. etc. etc.
      AS, PROPERTY are LEGALLY REGISTERED..
      Register means:
      The transfer of ownership of property, in return for.. "equity-rights" the USE, of said property to create profit. This is HOW you are able to "sell your" house, car, gun, whatever!

      The Bank Of Rome has run their poison scheme for centuries, in THEIR WORLD "MONOPOLY" SOCIETY YOU are ALWAYS "the TENANT". is YOU are ALWAYS "The KEEPER" even after you've "paid-off" that last monthly mortgage payment.. and have a CERTIFICATE of ownership in your hands. (Yes, it can be said you DO in fact, own THAT piece of paper)

      WHY IS THE VATICAN ABLE TO DO THESE THINGS?
      The Vatican/ Bank Of Rome holds the intellectual copyrights to (they LEGALLY own) ALL mortgaged property on Earth (note: LEGALLY, people are land and/or property) This is LEGAL, officially & royally, since 1666 (After the false-flag event k own as the Great Fire Of London and the VATICAN declared ALL living men, woman, and children on Earth, LOST at sea and could ONLY be incorporated into (their) society, by way of a construct called LEGAL REGISTRATION.

      Thus, ALL property is registered TO the State (The state is ultimately, the Vatican bank).

      Your children are REGISTERED through the Birth Certificate construct, and ALL that LEGAL TENDER/currency, in your bank account you refers to as YOUR MONEY. well THAT'S not actually yours either ask for and read the fine print in that adhesion contract.

      (It's the Vatican's copyrighted LEGAL tender currency THEY OWN THE WHOLE GAME)
      Ref: Mort gage'
      (two French words for death pledge)

      All our lives we've lived under corporacy slavedom.
      Living flesh and blood men and women!
      We are NOT
      •Birth Certificates
      •numbers
      •I.D's
      •chattel property,
      •legal fictions, •useless eaters, or
      •members of the public
      WE ARE TO BE RESPECTED as LIVING BEINGS with God-given RIGHTS
      NOT civil rights.
      Our potential for a high standard of life has been purposely repressed for corporate profit and corrupt power.

      WE NOW KNOW THE GENIE IS OUT WORLDWIDE
      and it's only a matter of time, before they are out TOO! FIRED!
      (and WE KNOW exactly who "they" are who've been committing crimes against the good people of Earth..!!)

      about 7 days ago
    • Marco Campo
      Marco Campo

      How did the prosecution go? Or didn’t you do shit

      about 12 days ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      According to the Dictionary of law 7ed 2009 Edited by JONATHAN LAW ELIZABETH A. MARTIN Oxford University Press at page 410 clearly states
      “A police Officer is a Person who whatever rank within a Police force, holds the ancient office of constable ie. One who has undertaken to serve the Crown as an Officer of the Peace. His Office is in law, independent. He is not technically a Crown Servant, since the Crown neither appoints him nor pays him, nor is he a local authority employee”
      When looking at “The home office guidance V2 revised 2012 at CHAPTER 1” we can see:
      Guidance on Standards of Professional Behaviour
      Introduction
      1.1 Public confidence in the police is crucial in a system that rests on the principle of policing by consent.
      1.4 The public have the right to expect the police service to protect them by upholding the law and providing a professional police service.
      Honesty and Integrity
      1.12 Police officers are honest, act with integrity and do not compromise or abuse their position.
      1.13 Police officers act with integrity and are open and truthful in their dealings with the public and their colleagues, so that confidence in the police service is secured and maintained.
      1.14 Police officers do not knowingly make any false, misleading or inaccurate oral or written statements or entries in any record or document kept or made in connection with any police activity.
      1.15 Officers neither solicit nor accept the offer of any gift, gratuity or hospitality that could compromise their impartiality. Police officers always consider carefully the motivation behind such an offer and any risk of being seen or perceived to be improperly beholden to a person or an organisation.

      1.17 Police officers never use their position or warrant card to gain an unauthorised advantage (financial or otherwise) that could give rise to the impression that the police officer is abusing his or her position. A warrant card is only to confirm identity or to express authority.

      about 21 day ago
    • Easily Offended
      Easily Offended

      When the Starbucks guy asks his name, and he replies "Costa" !! 😂😂😂

      about 25 days ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to Easily Offended

      +Easily Offended And he has a Body Cam. You'll never get his video, so better do your own www.scambuater.tv

      about 10 days ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to Easily Offended

      An Equita Bailiff told me his Bailiff number is 123.
      U couldn't make it up, could you?

      about 10 days ago
    • Easily Offended
      Easily Offended In reply to Easily Offended

      Naughty naughty. No wonder he didn't want to be filmed.

      about 23 days ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to Easily Offended

      julian costa. not on bailiff register

      about 23 days ago
    • TheE4kid
      TheE4kid

      You little bitch! Talking all that shit then paying out

      about 27 days ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to TheE4kid

      Shit? So Mr Costa did not talk rubbish? Why u taking sides?

      about 23 days ago
    • ProwseOfficial
      ProwseOfficial

      This guy is a prick. You should see his video with Danny shine AKA socialexperimentalist

      about 29 days ago
    • craig shaw
      craig shaw

      He would have 100% got a left hook he reminds me of the nonce from Rita sue and Bob too

      about 29 days ago
    • Brian Whitelegg
      Brian Whitelegg

      Why don’t you just pay your fine.

      about 1 month ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      Russel Berger -Thanks. Bailiffs do have an important job to do. Being a sensitive matter, it is of the highest importance, that professionalism and lawfulness is adhered to. Hence the penalty for Abuse of position, by Agents of the HMCTS, is devastating on the victims, and thus carries severe penalties at law.
      When the laws are not applied to this rather large group of people and those who instruct them, we live in a tyranical
      state of affairs. Join thousands, sign and share the petition against Court Order Scams, used to steal Homes, Savings, Businesses, Cars and Children (HSBCC) www.ScamBuster.TV

      about 1 month ago
    • russell berger
      russell berger

      normally i would agree with the bailiffs but this guy is just being a complete ass to the debtor that's not right

      about 1 month ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to russell berger

      Russel Berger -Thanks. Bailiffs do have an important job to do. Being a sensitive matter, it is of the highest importance, that professionalism and lawfulness is adhered to. Hence the penalty for Abuse of position, by Agents of the HMCTS, is devastating on the victims, and thus carries severe penalties at law.
      When the laws are not applied to this rather large group of people and those who instruct them, we live in a tyranical
      state of affairs. Join thousands, sign and share the petition against Court Order Scams, used to steal Homes, Savings, Businesses, Cars and Children (HSBCC) www.ScamBuster.TV

      about 1 month ago
    • russell berger
      russell berger In reply to russell berger

      if hes for real he would have no problem being filmed even i question him about his legitimacy

      about 1 month ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      Sorry to hear. Agreed it is criminal activity. But no law allows such things. How can they "FINE" you £700.00, wothout a trial, and without you signing anything to agree to it. The reality is, they used threats against you, and lied to you that they have a "COURT ORDER", in order to make themselves seem legit, and play a nudge wink game with the police to assist them, on the grounds that they have an authentic "COURT ORDER", when they dont.
      I would uses this video link, and request the Court Order, or your money back, plus Aggravated Damages and arrest of the offender who claimed they had a "COURT ORDER".
      Join Thousands, sign and share the petition against Court Order Scams www.ScamBuster.TV

      about 1 month ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      Julian Costa, Illegal Bailiff, actually said, (recorded), that he has a Court Stamp, which he carries around with him all the time. Join Thousands, Sign the petition to Stop Court Order Scams www.ScamBuster.TV

      about 1 month ago
    • The AvaloniaN
      The AvaloniaN

      He’s just pissed off because of that receding hair line.

      about 1 month ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to The AvaloniaN

      Julian Costa, Illegal Bailiff, actually said, (recorded), that he has a Court Stamp, which he carries around with him all the time. Join Thousands, Sign the petition to Stop Court Order Scams www.ScamBuster.TV

      about 1 month ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      The accountants’ laundromat: How Britain is still washing dirty money
      Prem Sikka
      Yesterday
      Left Foot Forward
      Accounting regulators are scared of cracking down on laundering, writes Prem Sikka.


      Share
      Tweet
      Almost twenty years ago, I co-authored a monograph titled “The Accountants’ Laundromat” which explained how accountants and accountancy firms launder illicit financial flows.

      It was prompted by the High Court judgement in the case of AGIP (Africa) Limited v Jackson & Others (1990) 1 Ch. 265, where the judge said that accountants:

      “Knew they were laundering money … It must have been obvious to them that their clients could not afford their activities to see the light of the day. Secrecy is the badge of fraud. They must have realised at least that their clients might be involved in a fraud on the plaintiffs.”

      The shell companies formed in the UK and elsewhere facilitated secrecy and were central to the case. They did not trade but large amounts of money passed through their bank accounts.

      Despite the strong court judgement and an accompanying adjournment debate in the House of Commons, the police, regulators, government departments, accountancy trade associations, the Attorney General and the Prime Minister all declined to investigate the named accountancy firm, its partners and other accountants. They deemed it to be a matter for someone else.

      Since then, the obfuscation and buck-passing has continued in the sector – and the scale of money laundering has increased across the UK.

      Twenty years later, the scale of global money laundering is estimated to have risen from $500bn to $2tn (£1.5tn). Last month, the House of Commons Treasury Committee reported that the “scale of money laundering impacting the UK annually could be in the hundreds of billions of pounds” and the much touted £90 billion figure was “a conservative estimate”.

      The illicit flows are used to fund drug trafficking, human trafficking, gangsters, theft and much more. Dirty money has piled into arts, property and stock market to inflate prices and deprive many people the opportunity to get on the housing ladder.

      The UK has had little success in curbing money laundering. One of the reasons is a poor regulatory system. The UK has around 25 separate regulators dealing with money laundering. These include the Financial Conduct Authority, HMRC, the Gambling Commission and the 22 accountancy and legal trade associations. They excel at buck-passing, use different benchmarks, priorities and interpretations of law and related guidance.

      Turning accountancy and law trade associations into regulators is the height of folly: they have no independence from their members and conflicts of interests are inevitable.

      That folly is compounded by the exclusion of 22 accountancy and legal bodies from the application of the Freedom of Information law, which would enable citizens to ask questions about their inertia. Rather than clearing the mess, in January 2018, the government created the Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) to supervise the 22 bodies. This did not add any urgency or teeth to the regulatory process.

      Despite a plethora of form-filling and regulators, the UK has had little success in curbing money laundering. Transparency International examined 52 cases of global corruption and noted that some 766 UK-registered companies were involved in laundering stolen money.

      Indeed, UK-based companies and partnerships remain central to global flow of dirty money. The finger is firmly pointed at accountants, as they have the necessary know-how to create complex structures and conceal the trail of dirty money.

      A joint report from the UK Home Office and HM Treasury reported:

      “Accountancy services have also been exploited to provide a veneer of legitimacy to falsified accounts or documents used to conceal the source of funds”. It adds that “Some of those accountants involved in money laundering cases are assessed to be complicit or wilfully blind to money laundering risks”.

      The report says that “law enforcement agencies have observed accountants reviewing and signing off accounts for businesses engaged in criminality, thereby facilitating the laundering of the proceeds”. The report provides case studies to show that accountants supervised by professional bodies are engaged in money laundering.

      Last month, a director of OPBAS finally acknowledged the folly of relying upon accountancy trade associations to check the illicit activities of accountants. The director said:

      “The accountancy sector and many smaller professional bodies focus more on representing their members rather than robustly supervising standards.

      “Partly [that’s] because they don’t believe – or don’t want to believe – that there is any money laundering in their sector [and] partly because they believe that their memberships will walk if they come under scrutiny.

      “We were told, particularly in the accountancy sector, that professional bodies believed their members would leave if they took robust enforcement action.”

      The fight against money laundering requires action on many fronts. It also requires a redesign of the regulatory architecture.

      In line with our recommendations to the Labour Party, the House of Commons Treasury Committee has now recommended the need to consolidate the numerous regulators into a single publicly accountable body.

      Our report makes it clear that in view of their dismal failures, all statutory regulatory powers need to be removed accountancy trade associations. It’s time we closed the laundromat for good.

      Prem Sikka is Professor of Accounting at University of Sheffield and Emeritus Professor of Accounting at University of Essex. He is a Contributing Editor of Left Foot Forward and tweets here.

      Like this article? Left Foot Forward relies on support from readers to sustain our progressive journalism. Can you become a supporter for £5 a month?? And don't forget to sign up to our 4pm weekday briefing of the best in news and comment.

      about 1 month ago
    • Alien Suspect
      Alien Suspect

      The answer to this problem is simple register the car in a false name and address get as many tickets as you can collect

      about 1 month ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      What, the council or parking ticket? Mr Costa can't make his mind up, what his counterfeit warrant says, can you?

      https://www.quora.com/Do-cops-sometimes-use-fake-warrants

      about 1 month ago
    • JUAN HUNG LO
      JUAN HUNG LO

      Please come to my house so I can cut your boat off you big nose toucan faced cunt

      about 1 month ago
    • peter barber
      peter barber

      face it ScamBusterTV you stuffed up by not paying your tickets.if you right you wouldn't have paid them

      about 2 months ago
    • peter barber
      peter barber In reply to peter barber

      +ScamBusterTV you should know

      about 1 day ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to peter barber

      +peter barber Where was the warrant issued by the court then?

      about 1 day ago
    • peter barber
      peter barber In reply to peter barber

      +ScamBusterTV don't know but you cant show a vid from England and say there was a warrant issued in America

      about 1 day ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to peter barber

      +peter barber Was there a warrant, Issued by the Court, in England?

      about 1 day ago
    • peter barber
      peter barber In reply to peter barber

      +ScamBusterTV everything on vid was in England

      about 1 day ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV

      xenon 53827 Still can't explain why this video has gone Viral, and Julian Costa has gone hiding????
      Join thousands and sign the petition against Court Order Scams www.ScamBuster.TV

      about 2 months ago
    • xenon53827
      xenon53827

      The vid was good but the comments below are much better entertainment.

      about 2 months ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to xenon53827

      Still can't explain why this video has gone Viral, and Julian Costa has gone hiding????
      Join thousands and sign the petition against Court Order Scams www.ScamBuster.TV

      about 2 months ago
    • Neil TR
      Neil TR

      Pay your council tax you tramp

      about 2 months ago
    • ScamBusterTV
      ScamBusterTV In reply to Neil TR

      Council Tax? Tramp?
      Strong words toward the victim sir

      about 2 months ago
    • Conner Stevens
      Conner Stevens

      Pay your fine sir

      about 2 months ago
    • Malcolm McKay
      Malcolm McKay

      So, in the UK, they can take your car for parking tickets? If so it's akin to using a sledgehammer to crack an egg. UK citizens should be protesting strongly against these over the top strong arm tactics. Appears to me it's an enormous benefit to debt collectors & no one else.

      about 3 months ago
    • Toby Hawkins
      Toby Hawkins

      He'd get a slap then I'd cut the clamp off the car, it's illegal, simple as that

      about 3 months ago
    • sarah wass
      sarah wass

      Should have let you're tire down and pulled its off

      about 3 months ago
    • Darren Kay
      Darren Kay

      MR coster the Tosser. What a right tit why don't they like being filmed I seen videos of Tv license officials and they turn around and walk of as soon as they realize they are being filmed? And there was around 10 different videos it must be part of there their training to be told to walk away. What a shitty job.

      about 3 months ago
    • kiss my arse
      kiss my arse

      Look at the smug twat

      about 3 months ago
    • simon okeeffe
      simon okeeffe

      all bailliffs are cunts

      about 3 months ago
    • ArtfulDodgaNZ
      ArtfulDodgaNZ

      People just pay your bills, all these videos from scum bags trying to get one over a collection agent. Just pay the money you owe and you wouldn't have this problem. If you cant afford it dont get it plain and simple.

      about 3 months ago