Richard Hammond is back, taking a look at the all-American Chrysler Grand Cherokee with it's 4.7 l V8 engine, taking it from 0-60 in 8 seconds! He takes this great American vehicle for a test drive.



      chrysler grand cherokee


      about 1 month ago
    • Michael James
      Michael James

      Gay anal video

      about 3 months ago
    • declassified1

      Seriously watch this to understand why Hammond is wearing his sunglasses on his top lip lol,
      it's frikkin hilarious "Ross Kemp on gangs (spoof)"

      about 4 months ago
    • MAAK4

      Chrysler Grand Cherokee? Chrysler?! JEEP! Jeep Grand Cherokee!! Chrysler took over the AMC Jeep and finally managed to fuck up Jeep and discontinue the inline 6 engine!

      about 5 months ago
    • Tink Ertime
      Tink Ertime

      Dodge Chrysler Plymouth........JEEP

      about 5 months ago
    • PANU 11
      PANU 11

      very bad review

      about 6 months ago
    • Stinky Cheese
      Stinky Cheese

      It's always funny when some fool says "blah blah most will never go offroad" so you don't really need it, oblivious to the fact that much of the world encounters SNOW in the winter, and given more than a small amount, you may not only encounter a snow terrain just as demanding as being off-road, you might even need it to get out of your driveway in the morning because the effin' snow plow went through and you've got two feet high ice chunks between you and the road.

      about 9 months ago
    • Max Federle
      Max Federle In reply to Stinky Cheese

      I think these things are awesome in winter too. And I had mine off road in the Rockies. I do love it.

      about 2 months ago
    • Bud White
      Bud White

      i didnt know fags could get in an american ride?

      about 9 months ago
    • I never read replies
      I never read replies

      Grand Cherokees were sort of ok, but like all American cars, the build quality and interior materials are shite.

      about 10 months ago
    • Richard Bostan
      Richard Bostan In reply to I never read replies

      A tremendously ignorant statement.

      about 9 months ago
    • Mark B
      Mark B

      Imported to youtube from VHS! Sweet!

      about 11 months ago
    • Ihar Vasilyeu
      Ihar Vasilyeu

      So funny to watch it in 2018 lol

      about 11 months ago
    • Charles Macgilchrist
      Charles Macgilchrist

      The previous model managed to sell with a 5.9l rated at 11mpg city.

      about 11 months ago
    • Wolf Sheep
      Wolf Sheep

      No corners here in America. Clearly you’ve never been to Ohio. As far as fit and finish obviously you’ve never been in a European junker.. vw, Peugeot, Audi bmw. Really these guys compare everything to a brand new Porsche. Not enough power, fit and finish. Are you kidding me. This can’t be for real. yes, every single cherokee will be driven through a field! I guarantee that!

      about 1 year ago
    • James Hill
      James Hill

      I had a JK once... Shot myself in the foot with that one. Then I bought a 99 WJ 4.7. 24 mpg on hwy at 70 mph! 18 into headwind. My JK got 20 and 9 into headwinds. With the back seats down, fits a twin mattress no problem. Only downside, climate control dampers and electrical gremlins. Now that I've gotten all the electrical issues sorted, it hard for me to call her Christine anymore.

      about 1 year ago
    • LegendaryKing


      about 1 year ago
    • Frank Burns
      Frank Burns

      Hammond gets it. Then again, he appears to be out of his mind on cocaine or speed, so...maybe not the most ringing endorsement after all. Or maybe even better...enhanced sensory perceptions, and all that.

      about 1 year ago
    • cowboycarl121

      its funny how the old videos talk about the 4.7 so much when it was the 4.0 I6 that really shines.

      about 1 year ago
    • dfcvda

      glad he doesnt jitter around like that now, talking like every other car show host. This must make him cringe if he ever watches ..anyway I have the 4.7 Jeep and I live in England.

      about 1 year ago
    • tekknoviking
      tekknoviking In reply to dfcvda

      must be not cheap to run i guess ...

      about 11 months ago
    • David Schlotterback
      David Schlotterback

      So is there a Chrysler Wrangler and Chrysler Charger as well?

      about 1 year ago
    • Lynetta Mann
      Lynetta Mann In reply to David Schlotterback

      David Schlotterback lp

      about 10 months ago
    • Jimbob Jones
      Jimbob Jones In reply to David Schlotterback

      Sure... have you not heard of a Tata Discovery or Tata F-Type?

      about 1 year ago
    • Captain Glass
      Captain Glass

      That amazon money did his wardrobe the world of good

      about 1 year ago
    • supercrapnstuff11

      why do they always complain about tires in the UK, is it against the law to buy your own tires or do you just get a Vauxhall Frontera with offroad tires and go "Well i guess i have to spend more money on huge chunky tyres even if i never ever offroad mmh yes"

      about 1 year ago
    • Po 66
      Po 66

      what is weird is that there is a odd wiggle from the suspension/tyres where the car shifts side to side all the time. If you follow one you can see it, its feels odd inside too.

      about 1 year ago
    • charlie dee
      charlie dee In reply to Po 66

      It's the way the rear suspension is designed. The upper arm is an A with a ball joint on top of the diff. When it gets even a little worn you get the famous WJ ass wiggle.

      about 6 months ago
    • danny kelly
      danny kelly In reply to Po 66

      I know exactly what you’re taking about. My friends 07 does that. I bet the 2011 and up don’t because my 15 Durango does not

      about 10 months ago
    • Brian Tye
      Brian Tye In reply to Po 66

      rett butler I had an 01 and know exactly what you mean. I never researched it but it must have something to do with the rear suspension. I got used to it.

      about 1 year ago
    • David Whitehouse
      David Whitehouse

      grand cherokees are the boss on snow covered streets and k5 Chevy blazers

      about 1 year ago
    • 8rick1ane

      Richard looks like a pimp with black hookers swarming around him.

      about 1 year ago
    • Travis Tuttle
      Travis Tuttle

      he said no good off road? shit i took mine offroad all the time...stock btw...never had a problem. and this is hard core alaska offroading

      about 2 years ago
    • Cem Bese
      Cem Bese In reply to Travis Tuttle

      He said it is not "Soft roader", it is all terrain capable vehicle.

      about 5 months ago
    • Liam S
      Liam S In reply to Travis Tuttle

      Travis Tuttle lmao my dad has the 95 Orvis edition with. The 5.2 V8. It's an absolutely mosnter

      about 2 years ago
    • Yo Mama
      Yo Mama

      man age did him a favor,lol.

      about 2 years ago
    • Furness Prime
      Furness Prime

      why wear glasses if your not going to use them?

      about 2 years ago
    • Lacky Parker
      Lacky Parker In reply to Furness Prime

      It’s cool

      about 27 days ago
    • DarK ValdoR
      DarK ValdoR In reply to Furness Prime

      Furness Prime Because 90's

      about 1 year ago
    • negrokrilinful

      my mom used to have this car, a 2001 4.7 Limited. Very comfortable, and the V8 made the car run like a beast... the only downside: piece of shit of reliability, the car had only 65000 km and the electronics where fucked up, sometimes the key won't even turn so you could start the car. Not to mention the maintenance at the dealership was a bit to expensive ($1500)

      about 3 years ago
    • joseph billman
      joseph billman In reply to negrokrilinful

      852urkl jeeps well known to be reliable? they always come at the bottom of the reports

      about 2 years ago
    • MrBrentles
      MrBrentles In reply to negrokrilinful

      They're known for their reliability in Australia. They're known for letting new owners down with their warranties though. They're a bucket of shit hand grenade.

      about 2 years ago
    • 852urkl
      852urkl In reply to negrokrilinful

      You know, it is really sad. Jeep's are well known for their reliability but yet everywhere you turn on these online sites there is always one person who says they're garbage when history has proven otherwise. Their contemporaries are in the junkyards while they are still running fine. Anyways, the 4.7 was a steamy pile of poo compared to the 4.0 Straight-Six of happiness,

      about 2 years ago
    • Dakota Jaegle
      Dakota Jaegle In reply to negrokrilinful

      SuperNikola WJ is better

      about 2 years ago
    • Damon Fleming
      Damon Fleming In reply to negrokrilinful

      4.0 too f the 4.7

      about 3 years ago
    • Bogdanini

      I have same jeep.This car is spacious only for Richard Hammond. I can't fit "behind myself" and at front passenger seat badly made glove box - bad for knees.

      about 3 years ago
    • Beardie.D
      Beardie.D In reply to Bogdanini

      I prefer to sit behind the wheel rather than myself!!! Sure the leg space in the rear isnt as big as other cars but then other cars arnt as good as this Jeep either! I will never get rid of my 2002 WJ V8 i prefer it over anything, sure it maybe old now but it still drives perfect, still looks good and leaves everyone at the lights, what else do you need. Oh and i was quite surprised at Hammond's comments on its large size, i always thought it was more a mid sized 4x4, unlike the god awful Range Rovers, which by the way rust on the underside real bad, my 2002 WJ still as good as new underneath!

      about 11 months ago
    • Bogdanini
      Bogdanini In reply to Bogdanini

      +852urkl Closed minded, or just simple logic? Can you name at some reason/purpose/advantage first, why i need Eng.sys.? Especially advantage ;-)

      about 2 years ago
    • 852urkl
      852urkl In reply to Bogdanini

      +Bogdanini And you have just shown how closed minded you are. I learn both systems because both have their purposes and their advantages. To say that one is the only way is just plain stupid. See ya, I can see you won't change your mind and neither will I. So lets just agree to disagree?

      about 2 years ago
    • Bogdanini
      Bogdanini In reply to Bogdanini

      Because "Pascal" is shorter than "newtons per square meter " and because it's a good way to honor a great man.
      I not need to study both, cause there is no use for English one. So we are about same size.
      As much as you think my brain is small, it's not that small to go on personal insults.
      You may try as hard as you can, but I drove and dis/assembled enough cars, to compare.

      about 2 years ago
    • 852urkl
      852urkl In reply to Bogdanini

      +Bogdanini Yeah, I have no problem, sometimes they put the seat forward a little bit, but honestly, I have no problems. For your little brain, I'm about 1.9 Meters tall. Learn to use both systems, neither systems are going anywhere.
      We have to learn both the English Standard and the Metric System here in the States. I prefer English Standard because that is what I grew up with. Frankly a lot of the metric stuff makes zero sense. Why the hell is pressure called a pascal? Why not just call it newtons per square meter instead of giving it some fancy name?

      about 2 years ago
    • RockerDownunder

      They go pretty good offroad :)

      about 3 years ago