5G is a new, faster network with the potential to completely transform the internet. So what makes it so revolutionary? CNBC’s Tom Chitty explains.

-----

Subscribe to us on YouTube: cnb.cx/2wuoARM

Subscribe to CNBC Life on YouTube: cnb.cx/2wAkfMv

Like our Facebook page:
www.facebook.com/cnbcinternational

Follow us on Instagram:
www.instagram.com/cnbcinternational/

Follow us on Twitter:
twitter.com/CNBCi

Comments

    • MikeyLuvesGames
      MikeyLuvesGames

      5G is able to litteraly destroy the bonds to your cells which can lead to lots of tumors and other dangers, they can mess up and destroy any cells in water, which means they will destroy our testicles and ovaries which will lead to MASSIVE infertility rates and mess with your eyes and brains, now think about what that can do to developing fetuses that are in the womb surrounded by water?? And don't even say "NoN IoNiZiNg" it is non ionizing but the wave lengths are short and compact which means that radiation is coming and bursting at your body non-stop and continuously and these won't be "miles away" like 4G or 3G no these things will be made in your CAR and in your HOUSE and OFFICE hitting you literally nonstop us humans are screwed and it will be too late to stop this soon

      about 15 hours ago
    • TVOK Okiem Snajpera
      TVOK Okiem Snajpera

      How about human healt.

      about 20 hours ago
    • Peet
      Peet

      I suggest to watch this first, and ALL OF IT : @

      about 2 days ago
    • polybo roides
      polybo roides

      5G IS A SILENT KILLER OF NATURE, JUST MAKES YOU WONDER WHAT IT IS DOING TO US HUMANS? 5G SHOULD BE BANNED.

      about 2 days ago
    • ehiflyer
      ehiflyer

      For 5G implementation, rest of the world use SUB-6 (3.5 GHz). Check your home WiFi routers which mostly use 2.4 & 5 GHz. If Sub-6 is harmful, your home routers would be too.
      Already implemented in Chicago and Minneapolis, only US uses MILLIMETER WAVE (30 to 300 GHz) to implement 5G, and needs a lot more transmitters because its transmission range is a LOT shorter than Sub-6.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G

      For frequency impact to human, Health Canada already has a report, seems SUB-6 is safe, while Millimeter wave maybe NOT: "For frequencies from 100 kHz to 300 GHz, tissue heating can occur and must be limited. Basic restrictions have been specified in this safety code for RF field exposures in the 100 kHz to 6 GHz frequency range, in terms of maximum whole-body SAR (averaged over the whole-body) and peak spatially-averaged SAR, (averaged over a small cubical volume). For frequencies above 6 GHz, RF energy absorption occurs predominantly in surface tissues (e.g. upper layers of skin) and the use of maximum SAR limits, either whole-body or averaged over a cubical volume, is not appropriate. "
      https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/environmental-workplace-health/consultations/limits-human-exposure-radiofrequency-electromagnetic-energy-frequency-range-3-300.html?fbclid=IwAR0Yy7NFmQZqFdlj5s1rIZD2o0ZhYdwOVGhmx9tBCxpmsxYhcFWIN4EO7Ro

      about 4 days ago
    • AnalyticalAnarchist
      AnalyticalAnarchist

      bunch of boomers in the comments lmao. technology is bad fire is scary and thomas edison was a witch

      about 4 days ago
    • đeri662
      đeri662

      I'm ashamed of our educational systems when I read comment sections like this. How most people in the 21st century don't understand even the basics of radiation is beyond me.

      about 5 days ago
    • Amish Gangster
      Amish Gangster

      Untested on Humans, they are throwing this tech out with no controle,we know that it contains radiation as they have refused to deny it.

      about 6 days ago
    • đeri662
      đeri662 In reply to Amish Gangster

      So what if it is radiation? Just because the word 'radiation' sound scary, it isn't necessarily dangerous. I'm ashamed of our educational system when I read commenta like this. You see due to radiation, radiation gives you fresh water and food, radiation is the reason we exist.

      about 5 days ago
    • Samantha Hickey
      Samantha Hickey

      These towers are destroying our minds. I almost always wear silver fiber hats to protect myself. www.denzdefense.com

      about 6 days ago
    • SEMPER PROGRATIS
      SEMPER PROGRATIS

      5G IS POISON.

      about 6 days ago
    • 于波
      于波

      China has discovered very quickly in this area, but our health has also been affected.

      about 6 days ago
    • Sebastian Nathaniel
      Sebastian Nathaniel In reply to 于波

      Please, explain more! Please share links if you have any! :)

      about 4 days ago
    • _R.N.04_ Bluefaceb
      _R.N.04_ Bluefaceb

      Wave stronger and more wavelengths to stuff with nature

      about 6 days ago
    • Gabriel Griffin
      Gabriel Griffin

      this is crazy , what about the health stupid sheeps?

      about 6 days ago
    • Evan Ms
      Evan Ms

      To the people saying "They don't explain the health effects of 5G!" Its fucking CNBC wtf do you expect?

      about 7 days ago
    • Muhammad Tauseef
      Muhammad Tauseef

      Forgot Ericsson?

      about 8 days ago
    • Epicuors Interstellar
      Epicuors Interstellar

      The digital age is evolving

      about 8 days ago
    • Charchita Shakalya G
      Charchita Shakalya G

      Superb! Even now cannot believe I just made $1029 with this fabulous web site here *Easy Laptop Life. Com* (remove spaces)

      about 8 days ago
    • Anton Dya
      Anton Dya

      { 𝘿𝙊 𝙉𝙊𝙏 𝘽𝙐𝙔 𝙄𝙉𝙏𝙊 𝘼𝙉𝙔 5𝙂 𝘿𝙀𝙑𝙄𝘾𝙀!..} 𝙋𝙇𝙀𝘼𝙎𝙀 𝙍𝙀𝘼𝘿 👇👇


      1. Higher frequencies = DNA & Cellular damage
      2. Cryptochromes = biological molecules --> ALL life (animals, insects, mammals, etc) has a magnetic sense
      3. Research has shown man-made EMFs disturb ALL species (sources cited below)
      4. Sign of life = presence of electricity (e.g. ECG or electrocardiogram) --> all life is electromagnetic sensitive
      5. Elaine Fox's research shows a significant statistical correlation (~90%), however, did not meet the threshold of 95% because they were only able to test this with 1/3 the people needed (~40/135)
      6. Almost all countries set public exposure limits to EMFs based on the ICNIRP's guidelines, none of these have NOTHING to do with long-term health effects from exposure to EMFs.
      7. All guidelines wrongly assume the only thing that can affect health is it is powerful enough to heat the tissue, but they don't know underlying long-term effects
      8. World Health Organization classifies EMFs as possibly carcinogenic to humans (No. 208; May 31st, 2011).


      𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙨:


      - Elaine Fox's and most (if not all) scientists' research is funded by nothing other than the Telecommunications industry
      - Scientists ARE NOT objective (they would like to), but reaching wrong results will lead to less funding and employability
      - Research is driven by market share and profit


      I will leave it up to you to reach a conclusion...it's common sense there are many factors that can influence this (eg. diet, physical activity, environment, chemicals, etc) but it is obvious there is an increase correlation, increasing the risk for the development of negative effects.


      𝙋.𝙎. 𝙒𝙀 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙋𝙀𝙊𝙋𝙇𝙀 𝙈𝙐𝙎𝙏 𝙎𝙋𝙀𝘼𝙆 𝙏𝙍𝙐𝙏𝙃 𝙏𝙊 𝙋𝙊𝙒𝙀𝙍.


      Please copy/paste/share this with everyone.


      Sources:
      - Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy of Imperial Valley College (Biology Department)
      - Professor Elaine Fox's "Hypersensitivity Symptom Associated with Electromagnetic Field'
      - https://youtu.be/FttrOK1ec4Q

      about 9 days ago
    • Leen Van Melle
      Leen Van Melle

      Horror for many ! sooo unhealthy! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNZOtrAzJzg

      about 9 days ago
    • Hype Videos
      Hype Videos

      Robotic machines is waving at you:

      Me: damn this 5G

      Robots: human revolution is going to end

      about 10 days ago
    • BILL NICHOLAS
      BILL NICHOLAS

      5G will have a definite effect on people’s psychological and physical health. Check out “5G Blessing or Curse”. This kind of radiation is very harmful over time to humans, animals, and plant life. There are credible scientists now raising RED Flags.  Not nut jobs, but credible scientists.  Over 10,000 peer reviewed studies that are being suppressed because the riches to be gained by a few are enormous.  There are safer alternatives that can be employed to utilized much of the new technology.  Less expensive when you factor people’s health into the equation.  Do the research for your family’s sake and don’t allow this assault on your personal
      health. Sign the petition: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org

      about 10 days ago
    • Keith James
      Keith James

      Why aren't the people who are creating 5G worried about it giving themselves cancer?

      about 10 days ago
    • Princess Diana
      Princess Diana

      WE DON’T WANT 5G OR THESE STUPID CELL TOWERS !! THIS JUST SHOWS HOW THEY ARE PUSHING THIS AND DON’T CARE WHAT WE THE PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY !

      about 12 days ago
    • tito yama
      tito yama

      The reason for 5g is because government are ready to force chips on us that's how they are going to control us

      about 13 days ago
    • tito yama
      tito yama In reply to tito yama

      @Epic Gamer Time I'm just talking shit LMAO

      about 12 days ago
    • Epic Gamer Time
      Epic Gamer Time In reply to tito yama

      Why 5g? What about 4g? So this time is the time they’re going to put mind control devices on us? Not the previous times?

      about 12 days ago
    • mzweedy1
      mzweedy1

      so...basically A.I. complete takeover of humans

      about 13 days ago
    • Silver Hammer
      Silver Hammer

      Gonna kill us off, what a load of horse shit , global annihilation here we go...world has gone mad, spearheaded by geeks and murderers...

      about 13 days ago
    • JamesGalaxy41
      JamesGalaxy41

      It's basically an oven simple

      about 13 days ago
    • Nick Kingston
      Nick Kingston

      fucking dangerous thats what it is

      about 14 days ago
    • Jus Beeb
      Jus Beeb

      Skynet

      about 14 days ago
    • John James
      John James

      One sided reporting is unethical. No mention of the Health Hazards ? The Surveillance ? The mind controlling Ability ? The killing of plants, animals and even alteration of bacteria genes ?

      about 15 days ago